Thomas Schlosser
-
3 votes
Thomas Schlosser
shared this idea and gave it 3 votes
·
-
14 votes
AdminDave
(Admin, Taglocity) responded
Would love to get more specifics on what you think we could do. Don’t want to breech their copyrights or EULA so we haven’t tried it yet. Please email us with your ideas to info at taglocity dot com.
Thomas Schlosser
gave this 3 votes
·
-
4 votesunder review ·
AdminDave
(Admin, Taglocity) responded
Right click to sort: http://www.taglocity.com/help/taglocity-v3/index.html?sort_tags.html
Admittedly search is a little unintuitive, you have to click into the tree and then start typing.
We do have ideas to improve tag maintainability though. I use about 1500 tags but I don’t bother with much maintenance. I do bundle some common ones together but otherwise I just set properties on a per tag basis when I need to by right clicking on the tag in the Tagger. Hope this helps!
Thomas Schlosser
commented
·
Hey Dave, the “just start typing” hint already was a great improvement ;)
Very good to hear about your 1500 tags (this actually I already asked as a support question, which now can be taken as “solved”).Nevertheless especially with my two other voted suggestions (GTD, better support for hierachical tags) there is still a good chance for improvement. Again: I would be willing to pay for upgrades with major improvements. My Outlook sits so much in the middle of my working life.
Thomas Schlosser
shared this idea and gave it 3 votes
·
It would love to have “More GTD” in Taglocity.
But I am not sure how it should look like. I can’t use Outllok’s flagging because I don’t have a 1:1 assignment from an email to an action. It may start this way, but then I receive more information etc. So I would need to define an action and assign (by tagging?) multiple e-mails as an information pool to this action.
Having said that, this would mean for Taglocity to treat a single tag as one specific action and give some GTD like features to this tag. This may end up in a specific view on the action-type tags and their respective Outlook objects.
I would loooove it!